DaSean Jones

Qualifications: What characteristics and experience qualify you to serve as a justice?

Judge DaSean Jones is a decorated combat veteran, district judge, and former civil rights attorney with broad voter support. His legal and military experience uniquely qualify him to defend the U.S. a

Ethics: Since judicial candidates solicit donations and raise money to be elected, how can voters be assured that campaign donations will not impact how judges interpret the law and review lower court decisions?

Judge DaSean Jones, with 23+ years of service, assures voters that his rulings are based solely on the law, not influenced by campaign donations. His deep commitment to loyalty, duty, and fairness ensures impartial decisions, rooted in the ethical standards he has consistently upheld throughout his career as a decorated Army veteran and district judge.

Equity: What can be done to improve access to justice for all, including persons or groups who may be underserved?

Judge DaSean Jones believes improving access to justice starts with eliminating barriers and ensuring fair treatment for all, especially underserved communities. He advocates for expanding legal resources, increasing public legal education, and fostering inclusivity in the justice system. By addressing systemic inequities, Judge Jones is committed to ensuring everyone has equal access to justice.

Judicial Elections: How would the administration of justice be impacted if judges ran in nonpartisan races?

Nonpartisan judicial races could potentially enhance justice if party influence is fully removed. Without party labels, judges might focus more on the law, leading to what could be perceived as fairer decisions. However, if party influence continues through endorsements or funding, the effort may be hollow. Some judges may bravely maintain impartiality, while others might still lean towards party.

Other Issues: What issues do you believe will be the most pressing for the Texas Supreme Court?

The Texas Supreme Court's similar backgrounds raise concerns about adequately representing the state's diverse population. As Texas diversifies, the Court must ensure its rulings address all communities. Without broader representation, public trust and the Court's legitimacy could continue to decline. Diverse perspectives are essential for delivering impartial and equitable decisions for all Texan